6/26/2019 0 Comments Ls Magazine TeenFind the perfect L S Magazines stock photos and editorial news pictures from Getty Images. Download premium images you can't get anywhere else. LS Dreams had girls doing everyday activities, but LS Magazine had a definite raunchy side. There was a lot of talk about this set, particularly the blonde girl who definitely had a great time. Most of the issue is artistic, however. Scared (or warned), LS Studios put out two more LS Magazines that showed a lot less before they were shut down.'
(Redirected from LS Magazine)
The Ukrainian Angels Studio, better known as LS-Studio, (and also LS-Studios) based in Ukraine and was an online subscription service and photography studio that created hundreds of thousands of photographic images (and hundreds of videos) of young teen and prepubescent girls and sold them via the Internet from 2001 to August 2004.[1] During that time it produced approximately 80 issues or collections, such as LS-Magazine, LS-Island, LS-Land, LS-Dreams, LS-Stars, LS-Barbie, LS-Flash, LS-Girls, LS-Fantasy, etc., and had thousands of members worldwide. Subscription was done entirely online, and members paid for the service with credit cards.[1] While early collections often featured nude girls in natural poses, later collections also contained many images of girls in sexually suggestive poses.[1] No actual sexual acts were portrayed but there were implied sexual acts. Many later collections also featured the girls wearing custom-tailored costumes. The backgrounds appeared to be custom-built, similar to stage-play sets.[1] Approximately 1500 children, ages eight to 16, were recruited as models in Kiev, Kharkov and Simferopol in Ukraine. Various nude photos were taken and uploaded to servers in the United States and Canada.[1] Quality and quantity of material from that studio was unmatched, and soon it became the most popular child erotica website in the world. The site brought in several hundred thousand dollars in profit during the three years it was in service. It has since been shut down.[1] References[edit]
External links[edit]
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LS_Studio&oldid=901866025'
< Talk:2004 Ukrainian child pornography raids
May 2006I must just be a naive Wiki-newbie and missing something obvious here because this can't have occured only to me and escaped everybody else. But it seems to me that the problem with re-submitting the LS Studios article, under that title, is largely semantic. By that I mean, it's just a question of using sufficiently neutral, objective language like, 'People who claim to have viewed the material report that the models appear to enjoy posing and treat the whole exercise as a funny game'; and, 'Press reports of 'child pornography' studios in Ukraine being raided by police, and the organisers being prosecuted, in 2004, are widely believed to refer to LS Studios, or to the production of material under that trademark, though this has never been confirmed by official sources'. Then you could identify and list the themes and topics that the LS phenomenon involves and relates to (with links to other Wiki entries which explain them in more detail). All of these are highly emotive and hotly contested, so how can you possibly deal with this in the factual and neutral manner of an encyclopedia? By typing: 'These issues are highly emotive and hotly contested'. On the definition of 'child pornography', for example: 'Definitions vary widely across time, cultures and national jurisdictions. Many argue (e.g. Judith Levine) that in the USA and UK the legal limits are unclear and dependent on the highly subjective interpretation of judges and juries, in which massive influence wielded by expert witnesses is almost never contested (trust me, I'm a shrink); and these interpretations together with a host of new laws, are constantly shifting in a conservative direction at the behest of 'political correctness', certain feminist groups, children's charities such as NCH, and tabloid populism.' OK, I wouldn't really include the 'Trust me, I'm a shrink'; that was just a bit of fun. Then you could reference the ten-level scale used in the UK, the relevant parts of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the UN Protocol on Child Prostitution and Pornography - noting that the two are lumped together, and that a 'child' is defined in international law as anybody aged under 18, with no distinction between a 17-year-old and a 7-year-old who pose topless in front of a camera. Both are assumed to be 'victims of commercial sexual exploitation'. BTW, that includes Samantha Fox and a host of other 17-year-old models who posed topless for Page Three of The Sun (British tabloid newspaper) in the 1970s and early 1980s; which by itself illustrates how the ideological status of a picture can shift from mainstream 'blokey' legitimacy to the unmitigated evil of 'child porn' within the space of a generation.Jason4sanity 01:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
2005It is not true that no overt sexuality was seen in the videotapes. Many contain simulated masturbation, sexual kissing and simulated oral sex.
Please contribute if you have additional information. I plan on adding more in time. Zebruh 05:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Okay. I've been working on making this neutral. It should be much better now. Zebruh 15:36, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Still online?!?!I'd have assumed from use by Zebruch of the archiving and from the raids that these sites are no longer online. Yet I very easily found them online (although I probably shouldn't list their current sites.. what was easy for me might not be easy for everybody else to find! Plus am not wishing to get into trouble like Zebruch did! lol So it would seem ls hasn't really been shut down, how come they still exist? Also shall we mention the actions of google? Was surprised to see this from a google search, I'd pressume it has got to be iok to include a link like that!! lol Anyway, just seemed odd to me that google would actually remove links from their results!! :o Perhaps it isn't too surprising, and should be expect. Just it seems like google could be going down the road they are already all the way down in china.. How long until the china google is the worldwide google? Came across this here, has a bunch of interesting info (although don't worry, no pictures there! lol). Might perhaps add this to the wiki article, such as the pay (10 to 40 dollars per hour, that sounds very very good to me if you are living in the former USSR!!) Oh, this seems of most interest: 'LS found out:1.Video is more lucrative than still pictures. For one thing, it's harder to repost on the usenet2.A technical improvement in video quality yields big returns.3. A woman directing or shooting the video gets more out of the girls and lowers their inhibitions.4. Preteen girls (age 7-10) have fewer inhibitions than adolescent girls, less 'leg lock'. Then comes LS Magazine: Each issue with 600-800 photos of 2 or 3 girls in 6-8 sets plus 16-20 videos of about 60-80 MB each.The magazine sells like crazy. Some explicit close ups, but doesn't really set off alarm bells untilLS Magazine #13. I saw this issue on the usenet.Two girls about age 8-9; one blonde, one brunette. The photo sets include close-ups of 'eagle spreads', suggestive play with food (sucking cucumbers, putting them in underwear, spilling liquids down their fronts, etc.). The videos include stripping to music, with a few planned 'eagle spreads'.LS Dreams had girls doing everyday activities, but LS Magazine had a definite raunchy side. There was a lot of talk about this set, particularly the blonde girl who definitely had a great time. Most of the issue is artistic, however.Scared (or warned), LS Studios put out two more LS Magazines that showed a lot less before they were shut down.' Should the article perhaps explain how LS studios is different from say somebody like David Hamilton? Because as it is now I really can't see why LS was raided when compared to David Hamilton's work?? Although I could be slightly superfical here in viewing the work of each of them. Mathmo 15:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC) I´m with you, Mathmo. We have to show the people the big menace it is. Ken Bruce April 20, 2006 21:54 (São Paulo, Brazil) Further refinementsFor those who wish to download the material from p2p networks, beware..while it is being suggested that these were all 'artistic' shoots many of the girls are both photographed and videotaped in sexual situations. To the point where it could be considered soft core pornography. To list the entirety of the collection is to aide and abet those who initially molested these girls. To say that no harm was done because the studios were well lit and the girls apeared cheerful is not the issue. Child abuse is child abuse. And this operation was shut down because they were abusing children.
I've removed the label 'child pornography' because it implies depictions of sexual acts, which are not present in LS content. Also, the potential value judgments about content (professionally lit and happy girls) have been removed, until some way to verify them can be found.
Here is my dilemma: I believe it would be 'easily verifiable by any reasonable adult without specialist knowledge' that LS photography is high quality and that the girls are always very happy. But who would dare say that they had verified such claims by looking at LS content? .. just some thoughts .. How would 'any reasonable adult' view all of the LS Studio output in order to verify the assertion that the images 'always' have certain characteristics ? As for calling it a 'child pornography' site, I see from this forum that they apparently had nude photos.[1] (note: that site would not be a proper source for the article because it's a forum). Weren't they raided and shut down for that? -Willmcw 21:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |